Project Inside Out: Chipper

Today I decided to act Chipper.  I'm usually quite dry and sarcastic so it was quite the change.  For the most part it seemed to freak people I know out.  They all seemed to believe something was wrong with me.  Strangers were fairly enthused by it, however some people seemed like they were overwhelmed.  I personally feel super drained from it.  Being that emotional can not be healthy for people.  I did feel a bit more energetic from it, but by the end of the day I just wanted to sleep.

For the most part I am not a fan of it.

I walk in your name

My friend is very OCD.  Always fixing the alignment of things in her house and is bothered by anything out of place.  I decided for my walk I would fix anything that seemed disorganized.  By the time I was in Urban Outfitters rearranging shoes I felt kind of crazy.  When I decided to align some bicycles on a bike rack I was honestly a bit embarrassed with the people watching me try and balance these bikes on each other.

3 Senses 1st walk

I chose to walk from the Marshall Building around campus area while on break from work a few times.

My Nose
            As i walk out hte back for Marshall there is a distinct smell of being down the shore and a ton of dead fish have washed up on shore.  Where this smell comes from who knows.  As I progress past Gentle Ben's the smell of garbage from the dumpsters mixes with the smell smell of cigarettes and food into a somewhat pleasing smell.  The middle of the road smells like dust from construction.  Outside no anchovies I smell pizza, beer and the passing red head's perfume; The perfume does not mix with the food well. As I keep walking the smell of sunbaked dust irritates my nose broken up by the smell of the occasional passing car.  At least until I reach a grassy area.  The water just sprayed and the smell of wet grass still lingers, despite the lack of water on the grass. Back to the dust, it is starting to smell good.  I pass some high schoolers in FFA blazers, they barely smell at all but it is clear that they are stoned.


My Ears

       The sounds of my walk

     



My Eyes

INB essay

Public space merely means that addition restrictions do not apply.              Ownership lines and what those ownership lines mean define private space.  If there are tons of extra rules and they are enforced then the private space is really private.  This however does not mean that people are unable to access it or intrude upon it.  In fact it is much easier to both someone inside private space than in public space.  This comes from the fact that when people interrupt you it ruins your control over the private space. In an ironic twist, private space, which is usually meant to give you security from the outside world, really creates more anxiety about outside influence inside.

Grey areas occur in urban places where space is tight.  Buildings do not own the sidewalk outside their house, however they do attempt to assert control over it.  Because of this parades like the Infernal Noise Brigade cause a level of stress that is heightened by the fact that all they can do is tell them to leave, but to no avail. This is one of the compromises of living in an urban area because you have to share the streets with everyone.

Encountering a random parade or performance in my opinion creates a heightened level of excitement for the observer.  The surprise of seeing the event also lends to a sense of discovery and getting in on a secret.  This also breaks expectations of what a performance is.  Usually at performances there are set roles: performance, observer, bouncer/staff.  At a performance on the street like All Souls Procession that paradigm is broken and the observer can become part of the performance, increasing their enjoyment of it.  This however also allows for them to not participate if they do not want to, which is a happy medium between a standard performance and asking for audience participation.

In terms of performances public and privates spaces operate quite differently.  Public spaces allow for an observer to interact with the performers and in fact often will invite them to see what is going on rather than show up with an expectation.  Because of this the sense of control is different empowering the observer in ways that simply cannot be done at a venue. However the straight forwardness of a private venue or gallery can be useful to have people pay attention to the performance rather than attempt to help perform in it. This attention can be more useful for attempting to get a message across sometimes.

One thing that I felt symbolized the idea of what the INB was doing was their Capoeira rodas.  Having been part of that community, when you hear the music you walk over and see what is going on.  Whether you go to play or go just to watch you become absorbed in the situation.  The music is almost like a secret code calling to Capoeristas saying, “Hey guess what we are doing?”  In a way the INB is doing the same thing.  They show up to events where the marching orders of the day are already west but they call people into order and give them something to rally around.

Music is especially powerful in engaging people. All cultures have some form of music and with the exception of much of Western Europe have had thousands of years of dance ingraining into their culture.  Western Europe repressed dance for about a thousand years and Europeans still dance, however it does seem to be more of a venue/event thing instead of a general way of life like in many African and Middle Eastern cultures. 

Something I find fascinating about music how different progressions seem to evoke similar emotions in people.  While an augmented 7th sounds dramatic, a minor 7th sounds wistful, even somber.  This makes it easy to use music to inspire emotions into people because while we may not experience every song the same way, people will be imbued with similar emotions. 

This allows for a band, especially a marching band, to motivate large crowds in interesting ways.  Whether you are calling people to dance from the crowd or commanding the to march with you, it is music easier to coerce crowds without disenfranchising them by saying, “Hey! You all should listen to me.”  While at the same time forcing them to literally listen to you.

With a large group playing music or performing something out in public areas it becomes harder to point at any one person and say, “This is the player.”  Without that ability one can only point at the group as a unit.  With the INB the group becomes larger and larger as other people fall into step, and with every person the effect is amplified.  Even if someone is not playing music, but just dancing, they add more gravitas to the performance.  Because of this people are able to perform more openly without the fear of being singled out for their performance.

When playing as a group in a private venue there is a sense of each person for the audience.  In a quartet you can see and hear the guitarist and because of this there is a lot more pressure on the individual performer.  This leads to more stringent playing and more stress.  It also creates expectations for the audience reinforcing the pressure.  Some performers are able to thrive on this, for example violin soloists must live off that pressure and some performers are scared off by that and only play in large bands.

Overall the physical context of a performance so heavily affects the rest of it that one could say location is everything.  Not only will location draw different crowds but also it affects those crowds differently.  

Projecting Scene

I got into an argument today.  It led me to thinking about investigating your own ideas and whether or not you can like yourself if what you believe turns out to be false.

Check it out here

Tactical Art in a pretention sauce

            The term “Art Fuck Words” may have been created by anyone.  This article defines “Art Fuck Words.” Although mixed into the masturbatory sense of importance of this article there were some interesting ideas.

            The idea of interfacing with your audience in an interactive way is interesting.  While most art seems to be static, performance art that includes the audience is at least a good way to interest the public. 

            I personally get hung up on the artistic promiscuity of the movement.  Claiming any medium can be in your movement is fine and dandy, even a good idea some would say.  The co-opting of health-care providers who fought to change HIV care policy seems a bit much.  The vague nature of what they are trying to do as well seems super forced.  The way digital is defined as being “about copying, re-combining, and re-representing,” is aggravating at best.  The word they are looking for is derivative.

            The idea that they want to point out ideas taken for granted in a participatory way is lovely.  The way it is described by Stanley Aronowitz almost defeats the purpose because it sounds like it would be hard to reach an audience while congratulating yourself that much.

 I feel that the vernacular of art can sometimes get in the way of having an active audience.  When your primary idea is to have an active audience, how you talk about your work says everything.  If you describe it in a way that seems humble or at the very least thankful for the audience being there as opposed to trying to come off like some ideological superhero you can reach more people.

Having a problem with the lack of ephermerality from people recording your actions or leftover scripts comes off to me as either incredibly anal retentive or complete out of touch.  When you work with participatory experiential art that includes non-artists you should expect them to record it in an attempt to remember it later.  If you cannot let them do that does that mean you believe your idea is ephemeral and lacks the import to be remembered?

What I believe this art movement needs is a healthy does of reality.  Without the humility that comes from living in reality you tend to speak about your work as if it is saving the world; While that may sound grand in a grant, in an introduction to a book about you it kind of turns me off.

Overall I do believe there is a very specific need to educate people through interactive events and get people out into the world and dealing with things and questioning givens.  However by giving yourself a name and co-opting other peoples’ work you defeat your purpose because who is going to believe you?

I would probably go to their events, but I do not think I could make it through this book.

Style Wars: Redux

A hip-hop artist is someone who wants to be part of an expressive subculture.  While most subcultures express themselves in certain areas hip-hop artists seem to almost inject themselves into areas.  From sneaking into train yards to get people to see your tags to rapping on the street, expression oozes from hip-hop artists trying to infect their neighbors and neighborhoods like a brightly colored virus dropping a good beat.  They keep getting better and better because of the constant competition. The idea is to show off and be better than everyone else.  This is especially evident in the evolution of breakdancing.  Break dancing was impressive back in the ‘80s. Now it is to the point where it is almost impossible looking.  Because of this a hip-hop artist can find a source of pride that comes from solely them, and know that if they are good enough they can influence their local culture directly.

The idea of going “All City” is rooted in the idea that in New York City you are one of millions of essentially faceless people.  The city is covered in billboards of attractive people selling products which tourists stare at, while missing the people around them.  By having tags on every train line, you essentially reach out to other Taggers and say, “I’m here and I can do this.” Other New Yorkers also see your work, but the idea is to be good in your own subculture while showing the world your work.

Although city officials may say differently since the ‘80s graffiti artists have set the tone for the colors of the urban scene.  They take the grey walls and trains and cover them in a type of art that comes in a certain NYC style.  Like whale songs the specifics of the style change over time and evolve, speciating with individuals and creating something all New Yorkers know and see as part of their city.

Tagging is a way of saying you own something on something. It is about leaving your mark and it is so intimately human you can see the graffiti in Pompeii. While graffiti was fairly concretely in the hands of the common people for millennia, more recently it has become in vogue to have it adorn your walls.  Artists like Banksy have transcended the idea of just leaving your mark and have moved on to making a statement with that mark.  By leaving a window of a happier world on an Israeli built Palestinian wall Banksy is bringing to light the ideas of the neighborhood enclosed, in that in a time past having a wall the world is incredibly nicer. You can try but you cannot stop and idea a tagger wants to get across. People have started to collect Banksy’s work because they feel like it means something.  The rich always adopt the vernacular of the proletariat , visual, auditory or otherwise.  The vulgate bible went from Greek to Latin then one day to German; Baller spots in New York have gone from “modern art” to graffiti.

When it comes to graffiti people just want to express themselves and have everyone see it.  Look at deviant art, or the Internet in general; people who are terrible at art want to show off their work.  Tagging a train or every train in the city is the ultimate way to put your artwork up on the fridge at home.  This transcends social cliques; it is universal to want to express yourself.  I would argue the only thing people want more is to have sex, get money and eat food.

Cap seems like an Internet troll. He bothers people in a way that he knows will hit them at the root.  Not because Cap dislikes them, but just because he wants to cover everything with his name.  Like the early graffiti artists they talked about he tries to put himself everywhere and spread his name not through quality but by brute force.  If you are a writer you know Cap because he’s scrawled over your work and if you don’t write you know him because his name is everywhere. There are always people out there who want to piss people off and pervert their work.  With social media nowadays it is more important to have more exposure than to have produced something amazing. Covering someone else’s art exerts power over them and in a way tells them that you are more important, because of this there will always be someone there to cross you out and write their name.

The Gallery scene is ridiculous.  You have what seem like graffiti knockoff art covering the walls with these pretentious folks talking about how these pieces are investments.  The work itself is still visually interesting but without the scale of a whole train car I feel it looks trite.  Without the context of it being hard to get a tag up it does not have the same power that a giant tag on the side of a train does.  You can take the graffiti out of the streets but it seems almost ironic to hang it up in a gallery and sell it to rich people for thousands of dollars.  A big part of the point of putting it up on a train is so that people will see it.  By selling art to a collector it will be put into a museum with an entry fee or it will be put into their personal collection for only their baller rich friends to see.

Taking back control of your city through graffiti can be a good thing.  However when you cover every wall in meaningless art, you defeat the purpose.  Berlin is a city that has the idea of graffiti right.  They have free tag walls where people practice their chops.  The tags change almost daily and you can really see some good work.  Then you have five-story pieces commissioned for a hostel, which makes you wonder how someone could have planned that to begin with.  Since people are going to tag the areas they live in it makes sense that you would want to at least give them an outlet.  With no outlet taggers will run around the city and put their own flair on things created by those in power and keep the struggle ongoing.  Whether they have the right to tag things is almost a moot point.  People have been scrawling on public walls forever, they are always going to and it’s something that should be harnessed, because attempting to stop it outright has not worked and seems pointless.